Close-in air attacks still needed despite new ‘Stand-off’ weapons tech

Close-in air attacks still needed despite new ‘Stand-off’ weapons tech

Interestingly, despite the necessary and much-discussed technical emphasis now placed upon developing long-range, precision-guided “Stand-off” weapons, “Stand-in” operations for “Direct Attack” are still very much in need, given the set of specific advantages they provide, according to a recent study released by the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies.

The report, called makes a specific and decided point of stating that a carefully calibrated mix of both approaches is what a fast-evolving modern Air Force needs. The study points to a series of significant variables with which to make this point, such as size, shape, scope and timing of attacks.

It’s called “Direct Attack”, or the ability of a stealth bomber to penetrate heavily defended enemy territory and drop bunker-busting weapons, hit moving targets, pinpoint small targets for close-in destruction and carry larger amounts of smaller-bombs for what’s called “Stand-in” attack.

Close-in air attacks still needed despite new ‘Stand-off’ weapons tech

Hi, I’m Devraj sheel Blogger. The founder of this blog all topics and many other online ventures. I’m a professional full-time story blogger, a digital marketer, and all topics. I’m here to help bloggers like you to create an outstanding blog and earn money from it.

https://devrajsheel.blogspot.com/