Hi, I’m Devraj sheel Blogger. The founder of this blog all topics and many other online ventures. I’m a professional full-time story blogger, a digital marketer, and all topics. I’m here to help bloggers like you to create an outstanding blog What should government do to stop social media addiction?

Upcoming Movies

10/Bollywood/ticker-posts

What should government do to stop social media addiction?

 What should government do to stop social media addiction?


  1. give some time to yourself to think about your future endeavours and plans and work accordingly
  2. begin by officially deleting your social media accounts (or atleast remain inactive)
  3. meditation and relaxation shall provide sufficient help
  4. if you are highly addictive,then change must come slowly not abruptly,otherwise the results would remain worse
  5. work hard,learn to be a learner forever.
  6. you may also make use of social media apps in a healthy way,by searching for inspiring role models,quotes, lifestyle habits etc.anything that helps you achieve your goals and dreams
  7. cheer up,think of the world you live in..you surely would miss an exciting adventure if u stay an addictive forever

On July 30, Senator Josh Hawley proposed the Social Media Addiction Reduction Technology (SMART) Act to limit features on social media platforms that may contribute to social media addiction. Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, claims that Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, SnapChat, and other social media providers have “embraced a business model of addiction” to design products which “capture more attention by using psychological tricks that make it difficult to look away.”

As the campaign for greater regulation of “Big Tech” gathers bipartisan support, Hawley has become one of social media’s sharpest critics. Earlier this year, he accused social media corporations of “developing new schemes to hijack their users’ neural circuitry” to keep their attention on social media, all while selling their customers’ information, without permission, to third-party advertisers. He even called Facebook a “digital drug.” Since 2012, the amount of time that an average user spends on social media has increased by 56%, up to over two hours every day. The SMART Act is not likely to become law because no other Senator has sponsored the bill. However, consumer rights advocates and a few other Senators have praised Hawley’s efforts to prevent Americans, especially children and teenagers, from spending too much time online.

What Are The Provisions Of The SMART Act?

The SMART Act targets a variety of social media features which compel people to stay on social media for hours. In the words of the bill itself, the law would “prohibit social media companies from using practices that exploit human psychology or brain physiology to substantially impede freedom of choice.” For example, the SMART Act would ban autoplay for videos and “infinite scroll” in newsfeeds on Facebook and other websites. These features provide users with an endless stream of instant content to read, watch, and share. The SMART Act would mandate “natural stopping points” in newsfeeds and “separate prompts” to play vide

companies from rewarding users for merely using their services. The “Snapstreak” feature on SnapChat is one example of this practice. Under the SMART Act, the Federal Trade Commission would have power to identify these practices and enforce the law to ban them.

What Do The Opponents Of The SMART ACT Say?

Both supporters and opponents of the SMART Act agree that the bill would significantly hinder the social media business model. It might even cost social media companies millions of dollars in lost advertising revenue. Nevertheless, no social media company has commented on the legislation. However, the Internet Association, which lobbies for social media companies, opposes Hawley’s bill and instead supports efforts to further study how social media affects children and adolescents.

Moreover, some critics of the bill, such as the libertarian R Street Institute, expressed concerns about government interference, while others disputed the existence of social media addiction. Some Silicon Valley leaders denounced the bill as arbitrary, overly broad, and potentially disruptive for businesses, entrepreneurs, and researchers who work on social media websites. The regulation of social media will undoubtedly remain a contentious political issue in the years to come.

Post a Comment

0 Comments

🚅🚅🚅 Thanks For Visit My Site Devraj Sheel Blogger 🚃🚃🚃🚃🚃🚃🚃🚃 Visit Again 🚃🚃🚃🚃🚃 Bye Bye 👋👋